Kialo requires cookies to work correctly.
Cultural appropriation is wrong
Cultural appropriation generally does not take into account the intellectual property rights of minority groups or their traditional understanding of those rights.
Collective intellectual property rights are more tangible for minority groups than for majority groups which makes appropriating them more controversial. It is difficult for intellectual property to belong to 20,000,000 people, but easier for it to belong to 100,000 people.
It is difficult to protect notions of collective authorship that stem from (non-European) traditions that have not been part of the western legal system. This means that they are more vulnerable and we should be more sensitive towards them.
The intellectual rights on something could not be attributed to the ill-defined concept of "culture" - at least not in the same meaning as they attributed to individuals.
As nobody has ownership over ideas or actions, nobody can own or appropriate culture.
"Intellectual property" is a broken concept itself. Property can only be applied to objects. By copying, I do not take anything. If nothing is missing, nothing was stolen.