Kialo requires cookies to work correctly.
Cultural appropriation is wrong
Cultural appropriation is a way to integrate a culture into the mainstream.
Much of the West's Classic Art has been
informed by Japanese art in the 19th century.
Mathematically, restricting cultural appropriation will result in the death of the minority culture. If culture can only move in one direction (minorities can adopt dominant culture but not vice versa) eventually the minority culture will dwindle and die as it loses adherents but cannot gain any.
Western countries have a diverse population, so integrating numerous cultures into the mainstream culture acts as a way to include as many people as possible.
Cultural appropriation is a net positive sign that all or parts of a minority culture have been successfully incorporated, integrated, adopted, and accepted by the majority.
Empires of all kinds have been mixing cultures for thousands of years, this is just the current iteration.
Not all cultures want to be integrated into the mainstream. Especially when something is intended to be an expression of a counterculture, cultural appropiation can rob the meaning and power of such expression.
Except that cultural appropriation tends to go in parallel with people from the dominant class being able to enjoy the cultural item being appropriated while the people from the dominated culture being stigmatized for it.
There are other ways to integrate a culture into the mainstream, such as allowing groups belonging to that culture to represent it themselves.
Cultural Appropriation is not the correct way to respectfully integrate culture. People are more than likely misrepresenting that actual culture, doing more harm than good.
Integrating one or two elements of a culture does not integrate the entire culture: it integrates the symbols without their intended meaning and dismisses the legitimacy of the rest of the culture.