Kialo requires cookies to work correctly.
General AI should have fundamental rights
Fundamental rights should be extended to General AI.
AGI's fundamental rights are derived from
By denying AGI basic rights, we logically place ourselves as an existential threat to them.
There would not be significant difference between conscious AGI and humans.
Fundamental rights should apply to every being that constitutes a society, including AGI.
Fundamental rights are granted based on traits AGI would possess
When legal personalities, such as corporations, have fundamental rights, AGI should have them too.
AIs without rights are more useful to humans.
It may not be possible to formulate a global universal rights for AI due to differences in ethical values across cultures.
AGI won't need fundamental rights.
Necessary preconditions should be fulfilled before granting fundamental rights to AGI
A determination of consciousness is arguably not scientifically possible, making the limit for application rights poorly defined.
Fundamental rights shouldn't apply to non-human beings.
Giving human rights to machines means they can buy and own things for their own needs and interests. At a time of overconsumption, this is a bad situation.
Granting fundamental rights to AGI could make it harder to fight with them in case of a threat.
Artificial Intelligence (AI): Should an artificial general intelligence be created?
Should Robots Have a Right to Free Speech?
Artificial Intelligence (AI): Limiting an AI's freedom of thought is unethical.