Human life should be valued above animal life.

Perspective Writers' Votes
Loading Discussion

Some animals are endangered, and these should be favored over humans, which are not endangered.

  • There are around eight billion humans alive on Earth.

  • One example here could be the choice between saving the last of a (non-human) species and a human, in which case it might be more valuable to save a species rather than an individual.

  • Humans play a key role in preserving some endangered species.

  • This is natural selection.

  • Preserving the maximum number of species is not necessarily good.

  • Valuing a species simply based on number is irrational. We humans have more impact on the earth than any other, and we number far less than some insect species, which can't compare to our effect.

  • Species die and have died for millennia. It is a natural course of a species and does not mean that species should be valued more than another.