Kialo requires cookies to work correctly.
Humans should act to fight climate change
Humans should act to fight climate change.
Market forces indicate humans should fight climate change.
Climate change is predicted to cause extensive human suffering.
As a result of climate change national and international migration could rise.
Climate change is putting increasing pressure on political governance and if not acted upon soon this could lead to growing strains on international peace organisations (eg. NATO, WHO, EU etc).
Fighting climate change could unify humanity.
Dealing with the effects of climate change in the future would be much more complicated than dealing with them now
Acting on climate change has many co benefits including reduction in air pollution, energy independence, the falling costs of renewable energy, less resource waste etc
Fighting climate change is a moral obligation, as those who will suffer are those who are unable to prevent it.
Climate change has a profound and negative impact on nature.
Scientists advocate to fight climate change.
We shouldn't fight climate change because it is natural.
Global climate is a dynamic system that corrects itself when interfered with.
Climate change benefits humanity.
It is better to take no action at this point, than to potentially risk additional harm to the environment.
Humans lack the tools necessary to fight climate change.
The money necessary to fight climate change can be used to better ends.
Climate change policy has become politicized,
funded in part by the fossil fuel industry
. This politicization has made citizens unsure what to do about climate change.
The Earth, which is so much bigger and older than the human species, will still survive.
Can Climate Change Be Reversed?
Are the Milankovitch Cycles major causes of climate change?
Should Humans Tour Space?