Kialo requires cookies to work correctly.
Is It Ever Right to Take Away Someone's Choice?
It is occasionally right to take away someone's choice.
Sometimes people can hurt others or themselves. In these cases it is right to take away that choice.
Often people don't know better and need to be forced into an environment where they can learn.
Until a person is an adult and capable of making decisions for themselves, it's necessary to limit their choices until they have learned enough to form opinions.
There are objectively "wrong" things, we should not be free to do those things.
There are times when someone isn't in a "right" state of mind, psychosis, grief, and after stabilizing they might make a different choice.
Taking away someone's right to choose assumes that what is good for them (their utility function) is the same as yours or follows some external standard. However, the best evidence of someone's utility function is what they choose to do (assuming they are of sound mind, etc.).
People need to be free to make their own mistakes, it's the only way people can learn.
Freedom of choice is the only basic human right. You should never be able to take that from someone.
You can never know all of the details behind someone's rationale, it's arrogant to assume you know better than someone else.
Is it better to live alone or with someone?
Is Vigilantism Ever Permissible?
Should the president be allowed to take temporary dictorial power over a country in times of crisis