Kialo requires JavaScript to work correctly.
Kialo requires cookies to work correctly.
Kialo
Is it okay to physically torture prisoners?
Perspective
All Votes
Loading Discussion
Torture can help force prisoners to reveal information that could prevent attacks and save lives.
Pros
Cons
As a society, it would be immoral to not value those who do not harm others no more than those who do. In other words, if it is for the greater good and you have to hurt a terrorist or murderer to save the lives of innocent people, it would be immoral not to do so.
Unpalatable though it is to contemplate, there are
extreme circumstances
that warrant more intensive interrogative techniques.
57% of Americans
believe
that torture tactics provide reliable information that helps prevent terrorist attacks at least some of the time.
The knowledge that torture is acceptable and may be applied is in and of itself a strong incentive for prisoners to cooperate with their captors.
Having the widest range of tools available to authorities keeps society safer.
The fact that agencies such as the CIA chose to use torture despite being aware of the criticisms surrounding it indicates that it is effective. If the people who are most familiar with the technique and its outcomes approve of it, we should trust them.
The use of torture is what induced Guy Fawkes to betray his co-conspirators after the failed
Gunpowder Plot
of November 5th 1605.
Allowing torture in extreme cases, such as to prevent imminent attacks or where a hostage may be involved, creates specialists in the subject, institutions with professional interests, and relativistic legal justifications which will then encourage the legalization and use of torture in less extreme situations.
There are other ways to reveal information and save lives without resorting to physical violence.
The information gained from torture techniques does not outweigh the harm caused.
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
produced a report
showing that C.I.A. failed to provide sufficient support for its torture tactics saving lives, and that in most cases cited by the C.I.A. as successes torture was not necessary or wasn't the reason for success.
Torture is ineffective at getting prisoners to reveal desired information.
There is no evidence that governments that use torture more often save more lives. However, there is evidence that people live longer in countries that don't use torture. For example, take Scandinavian countries: they respect
human rights
and have a low
violent death rate
and high
life expectancy
.
It is impossible to know if prisoners actually know the information that they are being tortured for.