Morality is objective.

Question

Answer

Con: It is logically self-evident that morality can only be subjective.

Answer

Con: Intersubjective theories of morality adequately explain morality.

Answer

Pro: Certain moral truths are inherent to human nature and transcend cultures and time.

Answer

Con: Morality does not operate in terms of true and false, hence it cannot be objective since objectiveness relies on these categories.

Answer

Con: The frequent presence of deep and intractable disagreement about morality indicates that no objective moral truths exist.

Answer

Pro: Natural Laws, sometimes called "inalienable rights," are sufficient to declare morality objective.

Answer

Pro: Morality is objective because moral values can be distilled through reason, and reason is objective.

Answer

Pro: If there exists a divine being, then objective morality exists.

Answer

Con: Even if morality were objective, there would be no reason for it to align with (modern and/or Western) human values.

Answer

Con: Even if morality were objective, we'd have no reason to care about it.

Answer

Con: Even if morality were objective, we'd have no way of knowing it.