Kialo requires cookies to work correctly.
Would Abolishing Privacy Be Beneficial?
Moral claims are relative to individual circumstances. Individuals are best placed to understand their own circumstances and so they — not society or their peers — are best placed to determine what is moral.
The information presented in the database could be misinterpreted and thus be used against a person.
Removing the effective choice to act morally reduces an individual's moral agency, and the inherent good of them being able to choose to 'do good'.
Things that have been considered 'immoral' in the past are now considered moral e.g. homosexuality, abortion, sex outside of marriage.
Things that are considered immoral by some cultures are considered moral by others (e.g. contraception). If individuals cannot determine their own moral code then minority cultures become oppressed.
What is moral or not reflects a community's values on what actions are likely to produce harm — they are a set of norms for how to behave such that one's actions do not harm others. People exist within communities and so should have their behaviour guided by that community.
With the elimination of privacy, society could better understand each individual's circumstances.
The standard of judgement passed on immoral and selfish actions is inequitable.