Kialo requires cookies to work correctly.
Make Democracy Great Again: Liquid Democracy
Replacing governing bodies like those of status quo democracies with a Liquid Democracy system would create new problems as Liquid Democracy cannot replace all functions of a "regular" governing body.
By voting a set of goals over a fixed term which is only changed in special circumstances eg war/ economic crisis, you give those responsible definite targets which they can be held accountable to.
Effective government requires fixed terms of office to allow policies to be enacted and outcomes delivered.
It would significantly discourage unpopular measures that are necessary for objective reasons, e.g. budget adjustment in a deficit scenario.
Discussing and developing hundreds of propositions is a core strength of Liquid Democracy which is not realisable under time constraints.
A balanced budget can be seen as constraint which could become harder to reach through Liquid Democracy.
Current systems do not necessarily perform well under constraints, either.
Just because the new system would have problems is not a strong argument against it.
Liquid Democracy could lead to improvements in the powers, and election process, of the executive branch (eg the President/Prime Minister).