Kialo requires cookies to work correctly.
Should People in Positions of Authority Resign When Accused of Sexual Assault?
People in positions of authority should resign when accused of sexual assault.
Resigning would be, or at least would be perceived to be, a noble act.
Resigning may help the organization avoid the negative consequences of one of their authority figures being accused of sexual assault.
High positions in society should only be held by people who are above reproach.
Sexual assault is a widespread issue, and should be treated with the utmost seriousness.
Regardless of whether a person committed sexual assault, they should resign because their accuser believes an assault was committed against them. The accuser is, therefore, a victim.
An accusation of sexual assault should be resolved through the justice system alone.
People shouldn't resign after 'just' being accused of sexual assault. If they are proven guilty, later on, then they could resign, but not when it hasn't been proven.
It may be advantageous for the person to offer to take unpaid administrative leave, rather than resigning from their post, while an investigation into the claim is conducted. This provides for a fair hearing, recognizes the severity of the crime, and gives dignity to the claimant by taking action.
False accusations of sexual assault can be used as a weapon to denigrate people.
Sexual assault and other sexual abuses are mostly unrelated to authority. These actions have no bearing on one's ability to run a business or a hold a political position.
#timesup: Should individuals credibly accused of sexual assault or harassment be fired from positions of authority?
Should people have the right and means to end their lives?
Will Sex Robots Advance Sexual Liberation?