Kialo requires cookies to work correctly.
Should the UN send peacekeepers to protect the Rohingyas?
The UN should send peacekeepers to protect the Rohingyas.
The UN can prevent the Rohingya crisis from destabilizing the entire region.
Genocide should always be opposed.
UN Peacekeeping Forces are the most viable option for protecting the Rohingyas.
The attacks on the Rohingyas serve to radicalize them, feeding a cycle of retaliatory strikes that can only be stopped by a third party.
A successful intervention could radically improve the UN's image.
There is no legal base for the UN to act in regard to the Rohingya question.
China is supportive of Myanmar. Any intervention will lack their support, and may turn China against the UN.
UN Peacekeeping Forces could be better used elsewhere.
The UN was wrong to label the situation as genocide.
The UN's history of interventionism is weak.
Is the UN a force for good?
Should The 'Poor' Be A Protected Equality Group?
Should Hate Speech Be Legally Protected?