Kialo requires cookies to work correctly.
Was the decision to ban Alex Jones from social media sites the right decision?
It was right to ban Alex Jones and Inforwars from Social Media sites such as Facebook and YouTube.
Alex Jones had irresponsibly spread false rumours such as the
conspiracy theory which led to violence.
Alex Jones has been proven to be incorrect on many statements, leading to injury or harassment towards people.
Sandy Hook Parents Forced To Move 7 Times Over Harassment
Social Media sites have the right to remove any content they deem go against their policies.
Infowars has broke several Terms of Service agreements, given temporary bans, and continued to break them.
Banning Alex Jones gave him media attention outside his audience.
This sets a precedent in which platforms can use moral a obligation to shut down other platforms and speakers alike.
Infowars and Alex Jones are using their 1st Amendment right to speak freely on opinions they hold.
Preventing Alex from sharing his voice validates his conspiracy theories. Allowing open debate will lead to greater agreement, after an open debate of his ideas.
that he was almost in a state of psychosis, considering quasi everything to being staged. Banning people from social network who are battling with psychosis isn't humane.
Alex Jones has a net negative impact on society
Is there a social media bias?
Should children be allowed on social media?