Kialo requires cookies to work correctly.
Should we have a single global language?
We could take advantage of this occasion to create a better language.
Esperanto is proof that an efficient, global language can be developed.
Languages have a variety of design features which objectively impact communicative efficiency including learning time.
Old languages like mandarin are not even efficient enough to fit on a keyboard and are often miss translated on computers.
Many languages include a sexist and binary view of gender. A new language could be more equal and with possibilities to talk about people with non binary gender.
We could make a writing system and spelling that is easier to spell and read. It would be good for dyslexic people and others too.
Any claim that one language or language feature is "better" than another is completely subjective.
If we want to have a single global language it's so much more easy to choose a already existing language than to construct a new one.
Creating even more languages to "compete" with the already well established language for this exact purpose, Esperanto, would be counterproductive to the goal of making a large scale effort. Noone is talking about inventing an alphabet for the blind - because there already is one!
Creating a new language for this purpose, ignoring Esperanto, would alienate the one global community that arguably has the most enthusiasm of all for the dispersion of a neutral, global language.